Sorry if it came off that way because I definitely didn't intend it. What other ingredient is that? Well dimensional travel certainly fits with observable evidence, that's for sure.
So Occam's Razor also suggests that there is some other necessary ingredient since Schala's pendant alone does not fit with all observable evidence. and Serge and team had Schala's pendant all along but couldn't access the DBT. There is one problem though, and that is that Crono and co. I don't think a time manipulational subject is "intrinsically more complex" than an object, but I will give you that since Schala's pendant was present during all instances of travel to the DBT, Occam's Razor suggests that Schala's pendant (and thus Dreamstone) is important for travelling to the DBT. There may never have been a timeline where Zeal survived for all we know. Was Zeal ever truly able to immortally control the future? Remember, Zeal existed ultimately because of Lavos, and in the original timeline (ie: the first pass through events) Zeal could easily have been destroyed by Lavos just like in all subsequent timelines. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood. This is often paraphrased as " All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the right one," or alternately, "we should not assert that for which we do not have some proof." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony" or "law of succinctness"): The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. Occam's razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham.
May not have control of the time period of the possible reality or even no control of which reality to choose at all.May be limited to the context of the story.Though while it be restricted to the context of the story, possible futures, pasts, and even present events withhold endless amounts of variety in spite of how distant or close it is to the original line of events, and users will inevitably find horrors, pleasures, joy, and sadness that could have been and still can unfold. Consequently, one might take interest in one or a couple worlds and may create a permanent stay. Users can travel to other possible worlds that can or could've happened from the endless abyss of alternate outcomes and continuities, being able to taste how dissimilar those probable worlds are to their own. Parallel/Alternate Earth/Universe Traveling.Inter-Universal/Many-Worlds/Multiversal Traveling.
0 kommentar(er)
